On Monday, May 14, 2018 07:03:35 Dukc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 07:02:37 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> > ------------
> > module test;
> > void main() { foo.i = 2; }
> > of encapsulation
> > void foo() { static int i = 1; }
> > ------------
>
> meant
>
> ------------
> module test;
> void main() { foo.i = 2; }
> void foo() { static int i = 1; }
> ------------If that's what you want, just make it a module-level variable. I don't think that providing access to symbols inside functions like that wouldn really buy us anything. In addition, we rely on function encapsulation for Voldemort types, and the rules for local variables and types are a bit special anyway. Trying to treat them as if they were at the module-level but namespaced by the function seems like it would be complicating things considerably for no real benefit. - Jonathan M Davis
