On 6/8/2018 10:04 PM, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 05:00:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
My goal in the short term is that Phobos is going to compile successfully with
dip1000 the way it is now. It has already been deferred and deferred and
deferred.
I understand that, and while you're doing that I can begin implementing the PRs
to deprecate `in` or change its definition to `scope const`, or something else.
Nothing I'm proposing will, in any way, interfere with what you're doing in
Phobos. I just want a decision about what we're going to do with `in`. I'll do
the leg work.
Your time is valuable, too, and while I'm not going to tell you want to work on,
I'd prefer something more important.
