Re: Is package.d a good idea?

[Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d]

On 07/01/2018 10:23 AM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:

I was suggesting we do what Rust did. i.e. 'import foo', imports foo.d, 
which can in turn do 'import foo.bar', which will import foo/bar.d.

AIUI, D doesn't support having *both* a module (ie, file 'foo.d') and a 
package (ie, directory 'foo/') with the same name (ie, 'foo')...for some 
goofy unknown reason. I agree that suggestion is how it should've been 
from the start.