On Wednesday, July 04, 2018 11:50:07 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote: > The obvious pros to ditching package.d and using a directory and module > with the same name are: 1. no ambiguity in the filesystem (assuming you > don't have weird package/file schemes) and 2. It's more understandable > to someone not used to the current state of affairs. > > To me, it's not worth it for just those things. I'm curious why Rust is > changing.
I don't know, but I suspect that they actually require that all of the modules of a package be in the same folder and don't allow the weird renaming stuff that we allow and then basically tell people to never use. I question that even then, inferring the modules in the package is ultimately a good idea, but it would make more sense if the module layout is less flexible. - Jonathan M Davis
