On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 15:58:14 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 10:57:51 UTC, Dukc wrote:
If not, should we in your opinion have an ability to define an
alternative destructor which runs only when explicitly
requested?
What does "when explicity requested" mean?
That the alternative destructor runs only when you ask it to.
There would be some way to say before an end of a block, return
statement, break statement ect that you want the alternative
destructor to be applied to the struct.
The normal destructor would not run when an alternative one is
used, but would run otherwise.
In fact, in this case it would be enough to elide the destructor
somehow.
