Re: Is there any good reason why C++ namespaces are "closed" in D?

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/29/2018 1:45 PM, Manu wrote:

There's no way you'll get a bug report from someone complaining they
can't multiply define symbols in the same scope. That's common sense.

But then you cannot interface with this C++ code:

    namespace ab { void foo(); }
    namespace cd { void foo(); }

Why would you find this acceptable?