On Tuesday, 7 August 2018 at 02:25:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Let's see if we can find some common ground.
The boilerplate I suggested seems to enable DPP to generate
working code that behaves "as if" the namespace scope is not
there, even for nested namespaces.
Is this correct?
Almost.
extern(C++, noise1.noise2.noise3)
void fun();
alias fun = noise1.noise2.noise3.fun;
void main() { fun(1); }
Except the full name bleeds to the user
|
|
V
my.d(4): Error: function my.noise1.noise2.noise3.fun() is not
callable using argument types (int)
Would you prefer to:
1) Keep as is, let it bleed
2) Suppress namespaces when printing error messages
3) Never generate the namespace in the first-place
