On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 06:34:01 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
The only real problem with D is that it's a language designed with GC in mind, yet there are numerous attempts to use it without GC. Also, supporting GC-less programming gets in the way of improving
D's GC (which is pretty damn bad by modern standards).
That's the only real technical problem.

I completely agree with this opinion

For example, the "bug" above just means that D doesn't support RAII (in the C++ sense). That's hardly a *fatal flaw*. Lots of languages don't
support RAII.

RAII is nowadays described as C++ nicest , more important and most powerful feature
D again, missed the opportunity on that one

Between Go, Rust, Ocaml, native C# and Scala ...
D needs a more serious and ambitious roadmap

The pragmatic approach, described in the main blog post, is not good enough, for a language that have a small community like D

Reply via email to