On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 13:21:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I honestly don't see how attempting to divorce druntime from
libc does anything but increase the amount of work that we have
to do and increase the likelihood that basic OS functionality
is going to be buggy, since we will have then reimplemented it
rather than using the same core OS functionality that everyone
else is using.
+1
Now that the leadership talks about Leverage points
http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/
When rated from 1 to 9 this is a 10, it likely brings negative
value.
This is even worse if D_SIMD version of AVX is implemented
because of that, loosing precious Walter-time (an illiquid asset)
for a non-existent fraction of users: also a 10.
Whereas merely adding colors to DUB would be a 7.
I feel even more uneasy by all that @safe focus, as if native
programmers started to care overnight. No, we still don't. People
say they do.
