On Thursday, 16 August 2018 at 20:37:33 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
In

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVzgkepAg5Y

Andrei describes his proposal for STL `Expected` planned to be included in C++20.

Have anybody converted the C++ proposal to idiomatic D, yet?

Hopefully without the pointer-legacy which unfortunately was allowed into `std:optional`.

Andrei claims we should it as return types for non-throwing variants of parse() and to() in the works at

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/6665

I get the feeling from the talk that Andrei has some opinions about how it should be done that aren't completely in line with what has been proposed for the C++ standard.

Reply via email to