On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 16:50:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
this(object.string x) {}
Yep, this works.
which will work - immutable(char)[] is what object.string
actually is (and the compiler will often use that -
immutable(char)[], the proper name - and string, the
user-friendly name, totally interchangably).
Yes, the true problem arrives on the operations like concat "~"
that call some internal function to do that with strings. I can
hijack the string identifier, but i can´t replace the concat
operator right?
(Well, i already tried the module object; trick, but didn´t go
much far with that path.)
void foo(string s) {}
foo("this");
won't compile, since it won't make a String out of that
immutable(char)[] literal without an explicit initialization of
some sort.
//cannot pass argument "this" of type string to parameter String s
iep, this seems a real problem. ;/
