On 19/09/2018 1:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 6:22:55 PM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 06:00, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 17:46:26 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/14/18 6:41 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
Specifically, Walter wants this to compile:
module whatever;
extern(C++, foo) void doStuff();
extern(C++, bar) void doStuff();
And he's not too concerned that you might have to use doubly
fully qualified names to refer to C++ symbols, like:
import core.stdcpp.sstream;
import core.stdcpp.vector;
core.stdcpp.vector.std.vector v;
This is probably the best explanation of why the current
situation sucks.
-Steve
Agreed. Up until now, I didn't even understand the rationale for
why it works the way it does.
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8667
O_O
Thank you Walter for coming to the party!
Oh, wow. I sure wasn't expecting that. I thought that he'd made it pretty
clear that a DIP was needed, and even then, it didn't seem likely that it
would be accepted. This is awesome. I guess that he finally came around.
- Jonathan M Davis
Indeed, thank you Walter!
