On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:13:36 +0100, grauzone wrote: > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> But let's not forget we have concurrency ahead of us. I encourage you >> all to chime in with your thoughts and ideas regarding all aspects of >> concurrency. The recent multicore performance bug is a great starting >> point. If you try e.g. shared and it's broken, let us know. If you try >> it and it works, push it til it breaks. If you have ideas on how to >> make semantic checking better, pipe up. > > There's a guy on the NG who posts once in a while how broken shared is > and how he has to use __gshared instead. His threads are being pretty > much ignored. > > And now? > > >> Andrei
I'm certainly in that category. I will be trying (soon) to put a post together that sets out my issues with 'shared'.
