On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 08:10:31 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 04/10/18 11:05, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 03:06:35 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
[...]
For the love of Pete, that program was an example of how a
move hook should work, *not* a demonstration of achieving the
DIP behavior without changing the language. I know the example
is brittle and have said as much.
The example isn't brittle. It is simply not an example.
If you want to leave it out, however, then I think you should
submit an orderly proposal. The changes you seem to be
suggesting have consequences that go beyond what I think you
understand, and there can be no serious discussion of it while
it is not clear from your posts which part of what you say is
the relevant one.
Shachar
While I want to thank you both, about the quality of this thread,
what kind of "consequences that go beyond what I think you
understand" are you thinking of? Can you give an example?
Thanks,
Paolo
