On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 14:35:34 UTC, James Japherson
wrote:
Took me about an hour to track this one down!
A + (B == 0) ? 0 : C;
D is evaluating it as
(A + (B == 0)) ? 0 : C;
The whole point of the parenthesis was to associate.
I usually explicitly associate precisely because of this!
A + ((B == 0) ? 0 : C);
In the ternary operator it should treat parenthesis directly to
the left as the argument.
Of course, I doubt this will get fixed but it should be noted
so other don't step in the same poo.
Are any languages evaluating it differently? For example, is this
different from C, C++, Java, C#, Ruby, Javascript?
