On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:22:19 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 2:35 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>> Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit
>> conversion in the other direction, which is not part of the
>> proposal.
>
> It's Manu's example.
Then I don't know what the proposal is. Pieces of it appear to
be scattered over numerous posts, mixed in with other text,
No no, they're repeated, not scattered, because I seem to have
to keep repeating it over and over, because nobody is reading
the text, or perhaps imaging there is a lot more text than
there is.
I can go look at the original post - and I have - but while it
may strictly speaking contain all the information I need, the
amount of time and brain power it would take for me to comprehend
the consequences is pretty large. I assume you have done a lot of
that work already and could save everyone a lot of time by
putting together a quick document that covers some of that, with
good examples. I'm not going to read {1,2,3}00 messages full of
irritated bidirectional miscommunication to try and understand
this unless I really have to, and I assume others feel similarly.
