grauzone Wrote: > justme wrote: > > bearophile Wrote: > > > >> C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some more > >> time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation syntax > >> because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be improved, but > >> they are listening to programmes (even if they risk creating a mudball > >> language): > >> http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/12/Mono-CSharp-Ex > >> > >> More on those tuples: > >> http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2009/Dec-23.html > >> > >> Eventually it will be quite useful to have some very well designed > >> multi-return support in D (like those tuples, but better). > > > > Doesn't D2 already have tuples in Phobos. D has the comma operator which C# > > doesn't so such syntax is not possible in D, me thinks. > > But tuples in D really suck. Compared to other languages, D tuples feel > inflexible, stiff, and complicated.
The burden of proving your claims is still there. Isn't D meritocracy - nobody listens your opinions unless you post compiler / stdlib patches. I believe the Phobos tuple classes are sufficient until a better system arrives in D3 or D4. D2 book is almost finished so you need to write your patches against D3 now.
