Brien wrote:
BCS Wrote:
That might be viable but the system was never intended for speed (its intent
was as a way to escape needing Mono on a non Windows system) so you would
be stuck having to write D code in C#.
Ok, that's good to know. I assumed because D billed itself as a "systems"
programming language that performance would be paramount.
He's talking about his converter program, not about D!
I'm sure I'm the millionth person to ask this, but- is there a language out
there that is bare metal like C/C++ with the friendlier syntax and developer
productivity of Java/C#?
D is trying to be exactly that. We don't have the infrastructure yet,
though. So the productivity gains are a bit theoretical at present...
