Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:28:42 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
Pelle Månsson wrote:
On 01/14/2010 03:55 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
What is @disable supposed to be for?
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/336
Thanks.
#define STCdisable 0x2000000000LL // for functions that are not
callable
The main idea is to allow creation of noncopyable types by marking
this(this) as @disable.
Noncopyable types are pivotal for a number of idioms important in
concurrency and elsewhere.
Andrei
Why not just make it final abstract instead? For example, the following
works now:
// class can not be instantiated, serves just like a namespace
abstract final class Namespace
{
static void foo() { ... }
}
It's about a struct, and it can be instantiated so it's not abstract
even in principle.
Andrei