dsimcha wrote: > Are you suggesting that we just get different syntax for it, or is the > suggestion > deeper? I don't think there's any chance of us getting rid of default > initializers this late in the game, and I think it's absolutely essential for > generic code that there be an easy way to get the default initializer for a > type.
T init(T)() {
T v;
return v;
}
The nice thing about the above is that it also works when T has a
default constructor.
--
Rainer Deyke - [email protected]
