"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> "retard" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:20:19 -0500, Bane wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for >>>>> the >>>>> people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the >>>>> inside. Merriam-Webster's online definition would tend to go with the >>>>> whole "outside force" idea: >>>>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor . Generally speaking, >>>>> censorship refers to one group cutting out or blocking material from >>>>> coming into contact with another group, but you might be able to argue >>>>> that it doesn't _have_ to be an outside force. Still, in any kind of >>>>> normal use, it would be. >>>>> >>>>> - Jonathan M Davis >>>> Legal/moral mumbo jumbo. There are group with resources to provide/deny >>>> something to other groups, and there are those without that power. >>>> Reason for first to do it at first place? Same why dog licks his ass - >>>> because he can. >>>> >>>> So if admin of his mailing list can exercise his power to make it more >>>> useful to majority of readers on expense of few (troublesome) >>>> individuals, the better. Its not like anyone is going to gulag if >>>> placed >>>> on ban list, for fucks sake. >>> At least in this newsgroup it's easy to get into peoples' killfile. Just >>> disagree with your beloved deitys, Andrei and W. >> >> Meh, I've outright argued with both of them plenty of times. > > I confirm Nick is not in my killfile :o). > > Andrei
Considering some of our recent discussions, if I'm not in his killfile, it's probably blank ;)
