Stewart Gordon wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Trass3r" <[email protected]> wrote in message
<snip>
Some date back to dmd 0.164 and one even is for gdc! Shouldn't those
be closed to keep the system clean?
Just because there's a patch submitted doesn't mean it's been accepted
and incorporated into DMD.
That depends on whether by "closed" the OP means fixed or merely marked
as such.
They definitely should be fixed by folding in the patches sooner rather
than later.
Stewart.
Yes, but look at how many of the patches are marked as 'enhancement'.
Most of the old patches have problems of various kinds: they are
incorrect or incomplete, but still useful.
The problem is with the bugzilla keywords. We need something like a
'partial-patch' keyword. In fact the current set of keywords is *far*
from ideal, and the version selection is really terrible.
