x.dot(y) and dot(x,y) are already implementable without language change.What about the simper: x.dot(y)As is std.numeric.dotProduct(x, y) without language _or_ library change :o).
That's why I wondered if it could be reasonably included (without introducing a ton of new stuff to the language).
so it should be usable like x.dotProduct(y), right? sounds fine for me.Unfortunately I can't even try to implement it cause my Core 2 is slightly too old ;)
Was introduced with Penryn architecture.
