On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:13:33 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote:

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:36:37 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote:

Don wrote:
 I don't understand this. How does belowTop() know how to call top()?

It calls top() through the normal interface mechanism. Inside belowTop(), this has Stack!T type.
Actually, I think Don has a point here. A virtual function (even on an interface) is always called with the 'this' pointer, not the interface pointer.

That is done via an adjustment of the reference. In the case of an interface method, no adjustment is necessary. Inside the method, "this" has the static type of the interface and the dynamic type whichever class implements the interface.


void foo(Stack!T st)
{
  auto x = st.belowTop();
}

OK, so if st's virtual function for belowTop points to the default implementation, there is no adjustment. But what if the actual object *did* override the default implementation? Does it also receive the interface pointer as 'this'? Where does the adjustment happen? What happens if you have a reference to the actual concrete object type? Do you have to thunk to the correct interface to pass in the expected interface pointer? It can't be both ways.

-Steve

Reply via email to