On 2010-02-16 00:53:31 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> said:
I think comparing arrays should work if comparison of individual
elements should work.
int[] a;
long[] b;
assert(a == b);
A minimalistic-motivated counter-argument could be put forth, but I
think we want smart minimalistic, not dumb minimalistic.
I think it makes sense. An argument could be made that it's slower so
you should have a separate function to handle it however, like
"walkEquals". But I don't think that's necessary.
On another note, I think comparing structs should work when you have an
array in it. I wrote a struct like this recently:
struct C {
int i;
string s;
}
And found out that the compiler compares them with a bitwise comparison
instead of an element-wise one, and since two strings might be equal
but not have the same underling pointer it makes the structs unequal.
I've also found that comparing associative arrays doesn't work by
comparing the content, as illustrated by this:
int[string] aa = ["a":1,"b":2];
assert(aa == ["a":1,"b":2]); // fails
To return to the original subject, should a comparison between
int[string] and long[wstring] work?
I think equality needs to be revised as a whole.
--
Michel Fortin
[email protected]
http://michelf.com/
