On 2010-02-17 20:07:20 -0500, Michael Rynn <[email protected]> said:
Is there anything that is really awkward in D2 working with immutable
string type, that cannot be done without resorting to mutable character
literals? If not, then the principle can be applied to all "immutable
source".
Well, array literals are not always constants. Take this for instance:
int[] array = [x, y, z];
This array literal does not have an "immutable source" as you call it.
Should it really require a ".dup" to get a mutable array? How efficient
would it be?
--
Michel Fortin
[email protected]
http://michelf.com/
