"dave eveloper" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Ezneh Wrote: > >> So, it is not better to find a compromise between these libraries ? >> Why they have to be "two" libraries rather than one which was designed by >> larsivi, Walter Bright and Andrei Alexandrescu ? > > I haven't seen larsivi around lately. Is it possible that there's a > communication problem? Perhaps a personality mismatch? >
He mainly hangs around the Tango forums. > Bearophile also always reminds us that a proper closure inlining support > would make collection algorithms as fast as the ugly string template hack > Phobos. That way you wouldn't have hard coded parameter symbols like a and > b. > I like having the option of pre-defined param symbols for closures. If a closure is trivial enough, then manually defining a custom-name can be overkill (but with D2's additional syntax suger for anon closures, it's not that big of a deal). The problem I do have with it though, is that they're evaluated in the wrong scope.
