"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > KennyTM~ wrote: >> >> Major silly names: >> >> - std.iterator.retro, std.range.retro > > Some arond here seem to be very comfortable about it. Anyway, let's find > another one (can't be "reverse"). >
"reverseOf"? >> - std.random.dice (it is a discrete distribution...) > > What's wrong with dice? > I like it, but I can definitely understand that some people might find its meaning too indirect. Maybe "std.random.discrete" or "std.random.even" or "std.random.regular" or somethingliek that? >> - std.range.iota > > C++, APL, Go: > > http://bytes.com/topic/c/answers/446688-iota > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iota > Could it be an overload of "sequence"? It looks to me like it's just a special case of sequence. >> Minor annoyances: >> >> - std.contracts.enforceEx (sounds like Win32 API which you should use in >> favor of enforce.) > > Agreed. Alternative? > "enforceException"? >> - std.path.rel2abs (why not relToAbs?) > > It's shorter and apparently there's no trouble in understanding it. > It's cute. But that's probably more of a downside. I agree with the other person who said "To" would be much more consistent.
