On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:21:29 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2010-02-21 02:15:23 -0500, Norbert Nemec <[email protected]>
said:
similarly, I would suggest
"reverse" to sort in-place
"reversed" to return a modified copy
I that's a not so bad solution, applicable to almost any word. There
are cases where it doesn't work ('split'), but probably not too much.
"split" - to split in place
"splat" - to return a modified copy
Just to clarify: there is some point being missed here. It's not about
in-place vs. copy. Please check retro's documentation.
By copy he means it doesn't affect the original. Retro returns a
"virtual" copy :)
-Steve
