Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I would also tend to agree that this set of rules is a bit arbitrary
and seems a bit like some overfitted classifier in pattern recognition
(although there were worse sets or rules in that regard).
Almost everyone has missed the point. We are OUT OF TIME. This is just
damage control.
All that's being discussed here is that it's easier to defend:
@pure, @nothrow, @safe
than:
pure, nothow, @safe
And I'm arguing that we have a consensus on that.
The only other worthwhile question is whether we have a concensus on
@deprecated. We might. Everything else discussed here has been a
complete waste of time.
And it may already be too late for @pure @nothrow.
