Fawzi Mohamed: > I don't see why the obvious solution from..to..step would have > problems, so that one needs the ":", but maybe I did not think enough > about the implications. Anyway I find .. more self descriptive for > slices than :.
If .. is more descriptive for a range of indexes (and I agree, despite it needs two chars instead of one) then to..step is not right, because to..step is not a range. So from..to:step seems more descriptive than from..to..step :-) Bye, bearophile
