Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote: > Back in the days, some people found D1's standard library, Phobos (aka. > the std namespace), a bit too simplistic, and so they went and created > an alternative "standard library", Tango: > > http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango > > Some see this as a problem, but personally I don't agree. If you prefer > a simple, C-like standard library, use Phobos. If you prefer a more > comprehensive Java-like standard library, use Tango. (Before, you could > even use both together, with the 'tangobos' package, which I believe is > outdated now.)
Personally I never had any real problems with there being two standard libraries, if only all projects on dsource would have chosen the lib I am familiar with ;)
