On 24/03/2010 02:39, bearophile wrote:
Thanks to being backed by Google Go seems to improve:
http://blog.golang.org/2010/03/go-whats-new-in-march-2010.html
Go also now natively supports complex numbers.<
While D2 will unsupport them, because D2 is probably flexible enough to not
need to keep them as built-ins :-)
The syntax x[lo:] is now shorthand for x[lo:len(x)].<
That's identical to the Python syntax. But the D version x[lo .. $] is
acceptable.
But there's a len() my dlibs too. It helps me avoid to write "length" all the
time and avoids my typos, and it can be used as delegate too:
map(&len, arr);
This Go syntax is cute:
Pointer to int: *int
Array of ints: []int
Array of pointer to ints: []*int
Pointer to array of ints: *[]int
In D it becomes:
Pointer to int: int*
Array of ints: int[]
Array of pointer to ints: int*[]
Pointer to array of ints: int[]*
Here I think I like the Go version better :-(
Bye,
bearophile
D vs Go
I do not agree
If we read D from RIGHT to LEFT like
Pointer to array of ints:
int[]*
than we have
* //pointer to
[] // array of
int
in Go
From LEFT to RIGHT
*
[]
int
So Go is just a pascalized C. who cares.
