> Sure: whatever problem you want to solve in D can be solved by any other > turing-complete language just as well...
Strawman. > Still, there are many problems that can be solved in D far more > elegantly than in other languages. Theoretically, huh. Until they are [solved with/by D] though, there really is not product there, huh. And I hear this a book trying to capitalize on this "personal D R&D" thing. Have they considered LSD and offering Koolaid when it all comes crashing down? > And since programmers are humans, > elegance is essential for correctness and managability of code. That was certainly a statement of wishful thinking, I suggest though, it was a statement of unknowing. "D" doesn't know what the problem is.
