On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:40:51 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 03/24/2010 04:35 PM, Moritz Warning wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:06:02 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >>> On 03/24/2010 02:11 PM, Moritz Warning wrote: >>>> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:55:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >>>> >> [..] >>> >>> Absolutely. I never know the full logic by which dmd.conf is found, >>> it's quite convoluted. You may want to submit a bugzilla enhancement >>> request. I don't think the dmd binary is essential, after all you >>> launched it so you can do a which dmd or whatever. >> I wouldn't know how to do that on Windows. Linux beginners might have >> the problem on Linux. - That one additional line wouldn't hurt. >> >>> But the name of the module being compiled would help. >> I am not sure what you mean. >> Do you mean "dmd -v" should write out the module name that is compiled >> at that moment? Sounds good. > > Yes. If there's a module declaration output that, otherwise output the > module name as inferred from the file name. > > Andrei
I would suggest to put it in a separate ticket. Cupcakes are easier to sell than cake. :>
