On 03/25/2010 01:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:

There are thousands of languages out there. If I did due diligence
researching them all, I'd never finish, as new languages get created
faster than anyone could ever study them. At some point, you've gotta
pick and choose what you're going to look at in depth. Each language
family is based on a core set of principles that get carried from one
version to the next. Pascal's core set is unbearably restrictive to me.
Sure, a lot of people strongly disagree, and that's fair, it is
subjective, after all.

Furthermore, like I said, anyone can propose features from any language
they feel would make a good fit for D. None will be automatically
rejected just because it came from a Pascal family language.

What do you think of Erlang's bit syntax if you've looked at it, or could you if you haven't?

Beyond the syntax, which is totally incompatible with D, I think it's pretty nifty and would be a sweet thing to have as a library template at the least.

Reply via email to