Nevermind, it is correct. I misunderstood how ".." works. Navin Kumar Wrote:
> Not sure where is the best place to note this, but on the webpages: > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/tuple.html and > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/tuple.html there seems to be a mistake, > > "alias Tuple!(float, float, 3) TP; // TP is now a tuple of two floats and 3" > "TP.length // evaluates to 3" > "alias TP[0..length-1] TQ; // TQ is now the same as Tuple!(float, float)" > > Shouldn't that be 0..length-2 ? Seems like 0..length-1 wouldn't result in a > slice, but the entire tuple itself. >
