On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 06:24:20 +0000, Steve Teale wrote: > On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:01:48 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > >>> > Since it is single-threaded, it should crash in the same place in >>> > the >> same way every time. This means you can put an assert on the crashing >> data (even without gdb it can be found by inserting printf's), and >> slowly work it backward to where the data goes wrong. > > According to an article I was reading that constancy does not apply with > current Linux kernels. They deliberately randomize things to make life > difficult for hackers. > > I'll try to find it again - it's about debugging GCC itself. > > Steve
Got it - http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebuggingGCC Right at the end.
