Fawzi Mohamed: > no the opposite is safe (pointer -> size_t) but there is no way size_t- > pointer can be safe...
In the stdint.h of C99 there is (optionally) uintptr_t that's is an unsigned int that is large enough to contain a pointer (there is a intptr_t too, signed). In C99 you use that to convert a pointer to an integral. I don't know if D specs assert that D size_t is wide enough to represent a pointer. Bye, bearophile
