Re: [gdb] Pushing the D patches upstream (again)

[BCS]

I could be wrong but it sounds like one of the major problems here is that 
the original authors aren't very motivated to help with this. If that's the 
case, how much work would it be to redo the work? I'm thinking a chines wall 
approach (I think that's the term) where someone looks at the patch as is 
and makes a list of bullet points enumerating what features it adds and someone 
else goes and makes a new patch that does that. The first should be a few 
hours work and, as it happens, I might soon be in a position to spend some 
time doing the second. (I've never working with DWARF or hacked GDB, but 
I wouldn't mind learning.)