On Fri, 07 May 2010 11:18:37 -0400, Robert Jacques <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Fri, 07 May 2010 11:11:47 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
<[email protected]> wrote:
As I've said before, I think a possible compromise to this is to allow
paren-less function calls when the return type is void. These
functions cannot be misinterpreted as properties.
I won't go over the other points again :)
-Steve
One of the major uses of paren-less functions is chaining, which always
return typeof(this), not void.
It's a compromise. It doesn't do everything you want, but it is good for
some of it.
-Steve
