"Michel Fortin" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 2010-05-08 16:15:58 -0400, "Nick Sabalausky" <[email protected]> said: > >> "Michel Fortin" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> >>> Everywhere? Saying Qt apps looks good and behave well on a Mac is kind >>> of >>> a stretch. I have yet to see one that is not sub-par compared from what >>> I >>> would expect from an equivalent Cocoa implementation. >> >> This is first I've heard of that. I find it interesting though. Can you >> post >> comparison screenshots and explain some of the behavioral differences? I >> promise I'll try my best to refrain from another of my "Apple sucks" >> rants >> ;) (I saw the screenshot that was linked to in the comment that you >> linked >> to, but I couldn't quite make heads or tails of what exactly it was >> demonstrating.) > > It's not "crappy" (I never said that),
Didn't mean to imply that you did :) > > [big snip] > Ahh, interesting. I don't use Opera, but I have tried it briefly and I seem to have a vague recollection that it wasn't quite native-look-and-feel on my Win machine either (but I might be remembering wrong). > But in comparison, Chrome is much better: they're using a real Cocoa GUI > and it shows. Now that I find really surprising. On Windows, Chrome is one of the biggest offenders of "To hell with native look & feel!" that I've ever seen.
