"bearophile" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> Nick Sabalausky:
>
>> // Vastly superior alternative to "import foolib.*;" which D
>> // (fortunately) doesn't even have anyway.
>> module foolib.all;
>
> What's vastly superior in it? Its unformalized nature?
>

In Java circles, and probably some others too, "import foo.*;" is widely 
considered bad practice. They have a number of reasons for avoiding its use. 
I don't mean to avoid mentioning them, but I don't have much time ATM, I'm 
sure you can easily google it though. But basically, there are known 
problems with it, and those problems are mitigated by using the "import 
foo.all;" idiom. 


Reply via email to