Hello retard,
Mon, 31 May 2010 13:57:34 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
retard Wrote:
snip
Even though he said all of that, he wouldn't be here and post so
often if he didn't think D was a good language.
There's no such thing as bad publicity.
And my "opinions" weren't completely wrong. You can easily see this by
writing a 5 LOC backend plugin for the 64-bit ARM backend of DMD. This
plugin should send you email every time the compilations succeeds.
When you compile this plugin, DMD should generate better whole program
optimizations than GCC 4.5. The plugin should also use lambdas with a
terser syntax than Haskell and its whole program type inference. The
same heap allocating closure should also work with both D1 and D2. Did
I forget to say that the plugin should also display the contents of
some internal compiler struct with .stringof - luckily the construct
is fully documented in the spec.
Would you like a kitchen sink with that?
--
... <IXOYE><
