On 2010-06-08 23:16, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Matti Niemenmaa"<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On 2010-06-08 22:27, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
6. Are there other languages with similar things for which the answers to
#3
and #4 are different? (And if so, how does Phobos/Tango handle it?)
Factor has pretty good support for Unicode:
http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-unicode.html
Actually, I meant other human-languages. Like, are there other combining
characters for some language other than Japanese that are indended to be
compared as unequal to their corresponding singe-code-point version?
Ah, sorry for the misunderstanding. :-)
I don't think so, no. The Unicode FAQ at
http://www.unicode.org/faq/normalization.html says "Programs should
always compare canonical-equivalent Unicode strings as equal".
Any idea if "Ruby markup" has anything to do with the Ruby programming
language? It's not clear from that Wikipedia article.
No, they're completely unrelated.
--
E-mail address: matti.niemenmaa+news, domain is iki (DOT) fi
