Kagamin wrote:
Don Wrote:(D has introduced ANOTHER instance of this with the ridiculous >>> operator.byte b = -1; byte c = b >>> 1; Guess what c is! ):) Well, there was issue. Wasn't it fixed?
No. It's a design flaw, not a bug. I think it could only be fixed by disallowing that code, or creating a special rule to make that code do what you expect. A better solution would be to drop >>>.
More interesting case is byte c = -1 >>> 1;
