== Quote from Nick Sabalausky ([email protected])'s article > "Justin Johansson" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > > Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it time > > that D1 should now perish? > > > > My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be > > better expended and focused on solidifying D2. > > > Other people brought up other issues with doing that, but I'll add this: D1 > users are primarily Tango users. And until Tango goes D2, those user's > migration paths to D2 would be fairly large (certainly not impossible, but > notably harder than it would really need to be).
Sometimes I feel like D1/Tango and D2/Phobos really should evolve as completely separate languages. D1/Tango feels very much like Java++, while D2/Phobos feels a lot more like (C++)++. If there's enough manpower for it, it'd be very interesting to see how this would play out.
