KennyTM~ wrote: > On Jun 24, 10 03:57, bearophile wrote: >> Thank you Jerome and all the people that have answered me, I was >> ignorant about GNU license. >> >>> if you call a DLL and give it a callback and your callback throws then >>> the cleanup code in the DLL won't be run (and vice versa of course). >>> SEH would allow this to work. >> >> If someone writes a compiler/language that allows programs to be >> ported with no problems from Windows to other nonwindows systems, this >> may damage Windows a little (but isn't Mono able to do this with C#2 >> programs?). >> >> But it's economically advantageous for Microsoft to make it easy for >> people to create new compilers and languages for Windows that work >> well with other Windows programs. So in my opinion having a good >> Clang++ on Windows is good for the economic well-being of Windows. >> They can grant LLVM a free licence to use Windows-style exceptions. >> >> Bye, >> bearophile > > Why should Microsoft do that instead of promoting Visual C++? ;)
Because they're giving away Visual C++ for free anyway?
Jerome
--
mailto:[email protected]
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
