Trass3r Wrote:
> > class one { }
> > class two : one { }
> > alias one ONE;
> > alias two TWO;
> > static if ( is(TWO T : ONE) )
> > writeln("test");
> >
> > Is this a bug, or am I doing it wrong?
>
> If it works without the aliases this is another strange alias bug.
Do you mean the "alias one ONE; alias two TWO;" statements, or the missing T
alias? In the first case, If I comment out the two alias statements, it will
still compile. But that's not a bug, it's still syntactically correct (in that
case "ONE" and "TWO" don't exist, but the compiler won't complain about it).
In the second case, the aliased identifier doesn't need to be there unless we
want to use it, see form #2 of the is expressions near the bottom of the page:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/expression.html
