On 6/27/10 8:37 PM, "Sean Kelly" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd like to cast a vote for a SAX-style parser. A DOM parser can be built on > top of it, and frankly, a SAX parser the only kind I'd ever use. I'm either > working with large streams where building a tree is impractical, or > performance is enough of an issue that again, building a tree is impractical. Agree, with one additional requirement: the ability to throw random chunks of bytes at the parser whenever I like, along the lines of Expat or XP. This is a must for dealing with a stream of XML like XMPP. -- Joe Hildebrand
